The Future Dominance of Solar and Wind Energy

There is surprisingly strong agreement in future energy scenarios about the dominance of solar and wind energy.

Solar and wind energy
IEA, IRENA, and others agree: Wind and solar will dominate future electricity generation. (Image: hpgruesen, Pixabay, CC0 1.0)

Discussions about the future energy supply can often get controversial. But there is a surprisingly strong consensus among experts that look into the future of energy about the dominant role renewables, particularly wind and solar energy, will play in the future.

Several organizations publish regular reports with scenarios about the future of energy. We will look at reports from the International Energy Agency (IEA), the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), BP, Bloomberg NEF, and DNV.

Each of these comes with its biases and particular perspectives. The IEA can probably best be described as the "mainstream" view. It is an organization funded by governments, and its 42 member states and association countries represent "about 75% of global energy consumption", according to their own description.

IRENA is also an intergovernmental organization, with the explicit goal of promoting renewable energy. With its 168 member states, it has an even stronger representation of the world's governments.

BP is one of the largest oil companies in the world, so its interests and biases should be apparent. Nevertheless, researchers and energy analysts often consider the yearly bp Energy Outlook a useful resource.

BloombergNEF is a private research organization focusing on the transition to a lower-carbon economy. DNV is a registrar and classification society for the maritime industry.

We are looking at the future of electricity generation, which does not cover all energy use. It is, however, expected that in the future - particularly if decarbonization is successful - electricity will cover a much larger share of the energy supply.

This is what these reports have to say about electricity generation in 2050:

  • The IEA's World Energy Outlook contains three scenarios representing different climate policy ambitions. In the STEPS scenario, the one with the lowest climate policy ambitions, the share of electricity in 2050 is: Solar 24%, wind 21%, hydro 14%, gas 13%, coal 12%, nuclear 9%. In the slightly more ambitious APS scenario: Solar 31%, wind 28%, hydro 12%, nuclear 12%, gas 6%. In the NZE (Net Zero Emissions) scenario, the one with the most ambitious climate policy: Solar 37%, wind 32%, hydro 11%, nuclear 8%.

  • IRENA's 1.5°C scenario in its World Energy Transitions Outlook assumes 33% wind, 32% solar, 13% hydro, 5% gas, and 5% nuclear. (IRENA lists onshore and offshore wind as well as photovoltaics and concentrated solar power separately, I combined them for simplicity.)

  • BP's Energy Outlook includes three scenarios representing different ambitions. It combines wind and solar in one category and "other low-carbon" in another (that includes hydro, nuclear, and fossil fuels with carbon capture). In the lowest climate ambition scenario "New Momentum" the numbers are: 44% wind and solar, 21% other low carbon, 20% gas, 14% coal. In the scenario with medium ambition, "Accelerated": 67% wind and solar, 25% other low carbon, 7% gas. In the most ambitious "Net Zero" scenario: 69% wind and solar, 25% other low carbon.

  • Bloomberg NEF has two scenarios in its New Energy Outlook. "Economic Transition" with 36% Wind, 29% solar, 10% other renewables (including hydro), 9% coal, 8% gas, and 7% nuclear. "Net Zero" with 48% wind, 28% solar, 9% nuclear, and 6% other renewables. (These numbers are extracted from their graphics, as they do not come with the raw numbers.)

  • The Energy Transition Outlook by DNV includes only one scenario, with a share of 38% solar, 33% wind, 12% other renewables, 8% gas, and 5% nuclear.

All numbers are from the respective reports in 2022. For simplicity, numbers below five percent are not mentioned here, and everything is rounded to whole percent values.

Some scientists and energy modelers consider these scenarios to be too pessimistic about renewables. The IEA is often criticized for having consistently underestimated the growth of solar energy in the past. In a recent paper, scientists from several different research institutions and universities gave an overview of 100% renewable energy scenarios - not just for electricity, but for the whole energy system.

In summary, we can conclude a few things:

  • There is widespread consensus that solar and wind energy will be the two most dominant sources of electricity by 2050.

  • In most scenarios, wind and solar combined have a share of more than 50 percent. Notably, this is the case in all scenarios with a high policy ambition to tackle climate change.

  • Not a single scenario sees a leading role for any other low-carbon source. Not nuclear, not CCS, not fusion.

  • No scenario considers nuclear fusion power to play any role in the electricity system in 2050.

  • There is a controversy about which role wind and solar should and can play in the future, but it is not whether they will dominate the electricity system. It is just how strong that domination will be.

  • Likewise, there is a controversy about which role technologies like carbon capture and nuclear energy can play, but there is a large consensus that they will not play a leading role.

Of course, projections and scenarios do not have to become a reality. But as these numbers should show, the dominance of solar and wind is a consensus among the majority of experts.

Author: Hanno Böck

Want to read more stories like this? Subscribe for free here:


You may also want to read:

Hybrit Pilot Plant

The path to Green Steel could be Hydrogen

Gas pipes

Hydrogen Heating and the Future of the Gas Grid

Hypercharger electric vehicle charger

Insecure Password allowed Administrative Access to Electric Vehicle Chargers

Siderwin pilot plant

Making Steel with Electricity

You can find this article online at

Subscribe to the Industry Decarbonization Newsletter: